[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Principles of Publication::
Indexing Sources::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
Open Access 
..
..
:: Volume 9, Issue 1 (Military Caring Sciences 2022) ::
MCS 2022, 9(1): 4-15 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Disposable Sterile Drapes on the Healing Time and Infection of Partial-Thickness Skin Donor Sites in Patients with burn Lesions in Selected Military Hospitals
Majid Haghshenas1 , Zahra Farsi * 2, Hengame Habibi3
1- MSc in Critical Care Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Ph.D. Medical-Surgical Nursing, Professor, Research and Community Health Departments, Faculty of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3- MSc in Nursing, Instructor, Emergency Department, Faculty of Nursing, Aja University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (1281 Views)

Introduction: Burns are among the most common problems that require a skin graft. The skin donor site has always been a difficult situation for both the patient and the treatment team. A proper dressing helps heal the wound and relieve numerous problems and complaints, such as pain or infection.
Objective: This study aimed to determine the effect of disposable sterile drapes on healing time and infection in partial-thickness donor sites in burn patients.
Materials and Methods: This one-group pretest-posttest clinical trial was conducted on burn patients (n=38) in 2020-2021. The samples were enrolled using a purposive sampling method and with informed consent. One or two skin removal areas on one limb area were placed on Vaseline gas and antibiotic ointment in the sterile drape intervention section and on Vaseline gas and antibiotic ointment in the control section. On the third, seventh, ninth, eleventh, thirteenth, fifteenth, seventeenth, nineteenth, and twenty-first days, the dressing condition was checked for variables.
Results: The results of the independent t-test showed that the burn wound healed earlier in the intervention section (14.84±3.30 days) than in the control section (17±3.09 days) (P=0.005). The earliest times for complete healing in the intervention and control sections were found on the ninth and thirteenth days, respectively. Moreover, no infection or other side effects were seen in either the intervention or control sections.
Conclusion: Disposable sterile drapes used on Vaseline gas reduced the healing time of partial-thickness donor wounds compared to Vaseline gas applied to the skin site alone. The use of these cheap and probably complication-free dressings is recommended for burn patients. Additionally, further studies are recommended to compare these types of drapes with other dressings.
 

Keywords: Burn, Donor site, Surgical Drapes, Wound Healing
Full-Text [PDF 2656 kb]   (415 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2021/08/18 | Accepted: 2021/11/9 | Published: 2022/07/1
References
1. Santoni-Rugiu P, Sykes P J. A history of plastic surgery: Springer Science & Business Media; 2007.
2. Gore M A, Akolekar DJB. Burns. Banana leaf dressing for skin graft donor areas. 2003; 29(5): 483-6. [DOI] [PubMed]
3. McDermott K W, Weiss A J, Elixhauser A. Burn-related hospital inpatient stays and emergency department visits, 2013: Statistical brief# 217. 2017. [PubMed]
4. Hop M J, Polinder S, Van der Vlies C H, Middelkoop E, Van Baar M E. Costs of burn care: A systematic review. Wound Repair Regan. 2014; 22(4): 436-50. [DOI] [PubMed]
5. Ramsey. M L, Walker B, Patel B C. Full thickness skin grafts.Statpearls publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2022.
6. Kearney L, Francis EC, Clover AJp. New technologies in global burn care-a review of recent advances. Int J Burns Trauma. 2018; 8(4): 77-87. [PubMed]
7. Ratner D, editor Skin grafting. Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery; 2003.
8. Demirtas Y, Yagmur C, Soylemez F, Ozturk N, Demir AJB. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor site: A prospective clinical trial for comparison of five differentdressing materials. Burns. 2010; 36(7): 999-1005. [DOI] [PubMed]
9. 9- Ayaz M, Najafi A, Karami MY. Thin split thickness skin grafting on human acellular dermal matrix scaffold for the treatment of deep burn wounds. Int J Organ Transplant. 2021; 12(1).44-51.(Persian) [PubMed]
10. 10- Cuomo R, Grimaldi L, Brandi C, Nisi G, D’Aniello C. Skin graft donor site: A procedure for a faster healing. Acta Biomed. 2017;88(3): 310-314. [DOI] [PubMed]
11. Ferreira LM, Blanes L, Gragnani A, Veiga DF, Veiga FP, Nery GB, et al. Hemicellulose dressing versus rayon dressing in the re-epithelialization of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: A multicenter study. J Tissue Viability. 2009; 18(3): 88-94. [DOI] [PubMed]
12. Herndon DN. Total burn care: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2007.
13. 13- Lairet KF, Baer D, Leas ML, Renz EM, Cancio LCJ, Research. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds. J Burn Care Res. 2014; 35(3): 214-8. [DOI] [PubMed]
14. Beiraghi-Toosi A, Motamedolshariati M, Einbeigi N. Dressing of the donor site of partial-thickness skin grafts with Vaseline gauze and fine mesh gauze. Medical Journal of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2016; 59(5): 322-7. (Persian) [DOI]
15. Barnett A, Berkowitz R L, Mills R, Vistnes L M. Comparison of synthetic adhesive moisture vapor permeable and fine mesh gauze dressings for split-thickness skin graft donor sites. Am J Surg. 1983; 145(3): 379-81. [DOI] [PubMed]
16. 16- Voineskos SH, Ayeni OA, McKnight L, Thoma AJP, Surgery R. Systematic review of skin graft donor-site dressings. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124(1): 298-306. [DOI] [PubMed]
17. TIR AftAoMIJA. Selection of surgical gowns and drapes in health care facilities. 2005 (11-2005).
18. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2001; 22(4): 248-57. [DOI] [PubMed]
19. 19- Salehi SH, As’adi K, Mousavi SJ, Shoar S. Evaluation of amniotic membrane effectiveness in skin graft donor site dressing in burn patients. Iranian J Surg. 2015; 77(2): 427-31. (Persian) [DOI] [PubMed]
20. 20- Hassanpour SE, Moosavizadeh SM, Yavari M, Mofrad HRH, Fadaei A. Comparison of three different methods of dressing for partial thickness skin graft donor site. World J Plast Surg. 2013; 2(1): 26-32. (Persian) [PubMed]
21. Fatemi MJ, Pegahmehr M, Khajerahimi AA, Chahardouli M, Taghavi Sh, Mostafavi Sh, et al. Evaluation of Polyethylen-Vazeline guaze and melolin on healing of graft donor sites in rat. Iran South Med J. 2014; 17(3): 298-306. (Persian)
22. Lars PKL, Giretzlehner M, Trop M, Parvizi D, Spendel S, Schintler M, et al. The properties of the “ideal” donor site dressing: Results of a worldwide online survey. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2013; 26(3): 136-41. [PubMed]
23. Misirlioglu A, Eroglu S, Karacaoglan N, Akan M, Akoz T, Yildirim SJDs. Use of honey as an adjunct in the healing of split‐thickness skin graft donor site. Dermatol Surg. 2003; 29(2): 168-72. [DOI] [PubMed]
24. Brolmann F, Eskes A, Goslings J, Niessen F, De Bree R, Vahl A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of donor‐site wound dressings after split‐skin grafting. Br J Surg. 2013; 100(5): 619-27. [DOI] [PubMed]
25. Cooper R. A review of the evidence for the use of topical antimicrobial agents in wound care. Principal Lecturer in Microbiology, Centre for Biomedical Sciences. 2004; 1: 1-8.
26. Barret-Nerin J, Herndon DN. Burn wound management and preparation for surgery. Principles and Practice of Burn Surgery:CRC Press; 2004. 97-114.
27. 27- Gore MA, Umakumar K, Iyer SP. Skin Grafts. Polyethylene surgical drape dressing for split thickness skin graft donor areas.2013; 1: 85-96. [DOI]
28. Edwards J. Management of skin grafts and donor sites. Nur Times. 2007;100 (48):52-3. [PubMed]
29. Pak CS, Park DH, Oh TS, Lee WJ, Jun YJ, Lee KA, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of povidone‐iodine foam dressing (Betafoam), hydrocellular foam dressing (Allevyn), and petrolatum gauze for split‐thickness skin graft donor site dressing.Int wound J. 2019; 16(2): 379-86. [DOI] [PubMed]
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Haghshenas M, Farsi Z, habibi H. Effect of Disposable Sterile Drapes on the Healing Time and Infection of Partial-Thickness Skin Donor Sites in Patients with burn Lesions in Selected Military Hospitals. MCS 2022; 9 (1) :4-15
URL: http://mcs.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-489-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 1 (Military Caring Sciences 2022) Back to browse issues page
علوم مراقبتی نظامی Military Caring Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 42 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645