[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 5, Issue 4 (Military Caring Sciences 2019) ::
MCS 2019, 5(4): 273-281 Back to browse issues page
The Relationship between Personality Traits and Teaching quality among the Faculty Members of AJA University of Medical Sciences from Students' Viewpoint
Moradi Doliskani. M1, Mohammadi Mehr. M 2
1- Ph.D. in Student of Curriculum Planning, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Isfahan University, Researcher, in AJA university of Medical Sceinces, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Ph.D. in Curriculum Studies, Associate Professor, Faculty of Paramedicine, AJA university of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (242 Views)
Introduction: Personality traits of university lecturers play an effective role in the reduction of academic achievement and enhancement of learning efficiency. Moreover, personality traits of university lecturers can be used to predict changes in their teaching styles.
Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between personality traits and quality of teaching among the faculty members of the AJA University of medical sciences.
Material and Methods: The present study is practical in terms of objectives and a correlational descriptive study in terms of methodology. The statistical population includes all the students of the AJA University of Medical Sciences during the academic year of 2017-2018(a total of 974 students). Using Krejcie and Morgan's sample size determination table, a total of 175 samples were selected through stratified sampling. The teaching professional ethics questionnaire designed  by Najafi et al. (2011) and Teaching Quality Scale by Seraj (2000) were used as data collection tools. Data analysis was performed using Pearson’s correlation test using SPSS 19.
Results: The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between personality traits and teaching quality of university lecturers (P <0.01). That is, the higher level of personality traits among university lecturers leads to higher quality of their teaching. The correlation between these two variables is equal to 0.398 which is considered significant (P <0.01).
Discussion & Conclusion: Considering the positive and significant relationship between "personality traits" and "professional ethics" variables, paying attention to the personality traits of faculty can be one of the main indicators and strategies for improving the quality of teaching quality in AJA medical university.
Keywords: Personality, Teaching, Quality.
Full-Text [PDF 353 kb]   (105 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2019/01/8 | Accepted: 2019/02/26
References
1. Gholami K, Asadi M. Professional experience of professors in relation to the phenomenon of effective teaching in higher education. J Theory Practice Curriculum. 2014;1:25-6. DOI: 10.1108/QAE-06-2014-0028 [DOI]
2. Zinabadi H, Abas Zadegan B. Citizenship Behavior in Teaching: Reflection on the Role of Professor's Professional Ethics. . J Hig Edu Curri Stu. 2016;6:27-46.
3. Teeroovengadum V, Kamalanabhan T, Seebaluck A. Measuring service quality in higher education: Development of a hierarchical model (HESQUAL). Qual Assur Educ. 2016;24:244-58.
4. Shabani Varaki B, Hossein Gholizadeh R. Examining the quality of teaching at the University of Science. J Res and Planning in Higher Edu. 2007;12:1-22.
5. Marsh H, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, Lüdtke O, Robitzsch A, Morin A, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structur Equat Model Multidisciplin J. 2009;16:439-76. DOI: 10.1080/10705510903008220 [DOI]
6. Pakmehr H, Jafari Sani H, Saeedy Rezvani M, Kareshki H. The Role of Teaching Teachers and Its Components in Developing Critical Thinking of Students: Opportunities and Challenges of the Curriculum in Higher Education. J Edu Psy Stud. 2013;9:17-39.
7. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does: McGraw-Hill Education (UK); 2011.
8. Yar Mohammadzadeh P, Feyzi A, Mohammadian K, Agh Atabai A. The Relationship between Personality Characteristics and Classroom Leadership Style with the Quality of Teachers of the University by Self-Assessment: Providing a Structural Model. J Edu Eval. 2018;10:29-51.
9. Cheraghi M, Ghiasvand S, Esmaeili M. Characteristics of Sample Professor: A Qualitative Study. J Urmia Nur Midw Facu. 2014;12:86-94.
10. Liaghatdar M, Shanazari J, Moslemi M. Investigating the Scientific, Professional and Personality Characteristics of the Teachers of Salavi Teaching Courses from the Viewpoints of Kerman Students. J Isl Rev. 2009;7:57-84.
11. Hosseinian S, Azimipour P, Karami A, Yazdi S, Keshavarz Gerami G. Investigating the Psychometric Properties of Nine Personality Types (Ingrams). J Occup Organization Consul. 2013;4:125-44.
12. Kacker R, Maringanti H. Personality analysis through handwriting. GSTF J Comput. 2012;2:94-7. DOI: 10.5176_2010-2283_2.1.134
13. McShane S, Von GLinow M. Organizational Behavior: Emerging Realities for The Workplace Revolution. McGraw HillCompanies. Inc; 2003.
14. Hazrati E, Zabihi R, Mehdizadeh A. The relationship between emotional intelligence and personality features with job satisfaction status of male junior high school teachers in Islamshahr city. J Educ Manage Studi. 2013;3:205-14.
15. Hejazi Y, Iravani M. The relationship between personality traits and job performance. J Psychol Educ Sci. 2002;2:171-89.
16. Davis M. Ethics and the University: Routledge; 2002.
17. Friedman H, Fogel J, Friedman L. Student perceptions of the ethics of professors. EJBO Electronic J Business Ethic Organiz Studi. 2005;10:10-5.
18. Campbell E. The ethics of teaching as a moral profession. Curriculum Inquiry. 2008;38:357-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-873X.2008.00414.x [DOI]
19. Cutchin G. Relationships between the big five personality factors and performance criteria for in-service high-school teachers: ProQuest Information & Learning; 1999.
20. Patrick C. Student evaluations of teaching: effects of the Big Five personality traits, grades and the validity hypothesis. Assess Evaluat Higher Educ. 2011;36:239-49. DOI: 10.1080/02602930903308258 [DOI]
21. Jacobson MD. Effective and ineffective behavior of teachers of nursing as determined by their students. Nurs Res. 1966;15:218-24. PMID: 5178187
22. Najafi H, Maleki H, Farmahini Farhani M, Jafari Harandi R. Evaluation of Professional Ethics Dimensions of faculty members' teaching from the viewpoint of students at Shahed University School of Medicine. J Med Edu Dev. 2017;9:93-102.
23. Sobhani Nezhad M, Baghai M, Najafi H. Survey rate on the Application of Professional Ethics in Teaching among Faculty Members of Imam Khomeini Marine Science University of Noshahr. J Mar Sci Educ. 2018;4:1-16.
24. Baghani M, Dehghan Neyshaboori M. Impact of teachers’ anxiety on teaching quality. Bimonth Educ Strategie Med Sci. 2012;5:9-13.
25. Qasemi L, Behroozi M. Survey of Personality Traits (Based on Big Five) In Professional Ethics's Growth In Medical Sciences University of Bushehr. Iran's Aspect. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015;190:334-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.007 [DOI]
26. Blanuša Trošelj D, Ivković Ž. Building the profession: professional ethics and preschool teacher’s education. J Pedagogic Theory Pract. 2016;65:403-20.
27. Sobhani Nezzhad M, Najafi H, Jafari Haradi R, Farmahini Farahani M. Components of Professional Ethics Teaching from the Viewpoints of Students of Qom University of Medical Sciences. J Edu Strategie Med Sci. 2015;7:399-403.
28. Bianchini S, Lissoni F, Pezzoni M. Instructor characteristics and students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness: evidence from an Italian engineering school. Europ J Engineer Educ. 2013;38:38-57. DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2012.742868 [DOI]
29. Mori S, Tanabe Y. Effects of perceived teacher personality on student class evaluations. Kinki Univ Center Liberal Art Foreign Language Educat J. 2012;3:163-81. DOI: 10.5539/ijel.v3n3p53 [DOI]
30. Tett R, Jackson D, Rothstein M. Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta‐analytic review. Personnel Psychology. 1991;44:703-42. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00696.x [DOI]
31. Judge T, Higgins C, Thoresen C, Barrick M. The big five personality traits, general mental ability, and career success across the life span. Personnel Psychology. 1999;52:621-52.
32. Murray H, Rushton JP, Paunonen S. Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses. J Educ Psychol. 1990;82:250.
33. Moradi Adoliskani M, Saeedy Rezvani M, Karami M, Amin Khandagi M. Identifying Standards and Components of Professional Ethics Teachers of Islamic Education. J Culture Islamic Univ. 2017;6:473-94.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

M M D, M M M. The Relationship between Personality Traits and Teaching quality among the Faculty Members of AJA University of Medical Sciences from Students' Viewpoint. MCS. 2019; 5 (4) :273-281
URL: http://mcs.ajaums.ac.ir/article-1-238-en.html


Volume 5, Issue 4 (Military Caring Sciences 2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم مراقبتی نظامی Military Caring Sciences Journal
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 32 queries by YEKTAWEB 3991